Buttonwood’s notebookFeb 14th 2018by Buttonwoodtwitter iconfacebook iconlinkedin iconmail iconprint iconEver since February 2016, when David Cameron, the British prime minister, called a referendum on the UK leaving the EU, the debate has been clouded by catchphrases, similes and confusing metaphors. If you haven’t followed the debate religiously, or you are unfamiliar with British idioms, these may…
Ever since February 2016, when David Cameron, the British prime minister, called a referendum on the
Those Brexit clichés explained
Why New Zealand has so many gang members
Martin Schulz resigns as leader of the Social Democrats
Do voters have a right to wear political garb at the polling booth?
Jacob Zuma’s last stand
Diesel-powered cars are on their way out
This was how the Leave campaign dubbed the economic forecasts made by the Treasury and bodies like the OECD and IMF about the potential adverse impact of a Brexit vote. George Osborne, the chancellor, certainly went over the top with his threats of a “punishment Budget” after a Leave vote. So far, the
Brexit means Brexit
This was the catchphrase used by Theresa May who replaced David Cameron as prime minister after the latter retired to his luxury garden shed. Mrs May, a Remainer, has struggled to make her priorities clear; we called her “Theresa Maybe”. The lack of a coherent plan by Brexiters has led them to be dubbed…
The dog that caught the car
Dogs chase cars but don’t expect to catch them and so are bewildered when they do. Many suspect leading Brexit campaigners never expected to win the vote. Now they have to make sense of their contradictory promises, the subject of the next cliché.
Have your cake and eat it
This old phrase has been revamped, most notably by Boris Johnson. The phrasing still confuses people, such as Paul Scully, a Conservative MP who tweeted this week that he couldn’t understand the problem: “There is literally no point to cake if it can’t be eaten.” The saying might be better rephrased “You cannot eat your cake and retain it”. In the Brexit context, it means you cannot expect to leave the EU and retain all or most of the advantages of membership. The EU’s favoured phrase for this is “cherry-picking”. Britain must choose between a…
Hard and soft Brexit
Broadly speaking, a hard Brexit means leaving the single market (where goods and services are traded on an equal basis, whatever their origin within the EU) and customs union (where members have common tariffs and restrictions on trade with outside parties). A soft Brexit would mean staying in one or both. But to Brexiters that would be…
Brexit in name only (Brino)
This would be a betrayal of the British people (although
Psychic ballot paper
The referendum only asked voters whether they wanted to leave the EU, not how it should be done. But politicians seem to have a remarkable psychic link with voters, believing they can divine a whole host of intentions from the answer to a binary question. So the public “decided” to leave the single market and the customs union, even though those options weren’t on the ballot paper and some Leave campaigners said there was “no question” of the single market being at risk. The most concrete promise – the £350m a week that would flow to the NHS will mysteriously not be fulfilled, even though it was on the side of the Leave campaign bus. But merely pointing out these inconsistencies makes your blogger into a….
This is the term devised by Brexiters for those who point the flaws in their arguments. Indeed, highlighting these flaws is seen as helping the EU in the negotiations. As the comedian Chris Addison tweeted: “Attention all those people shouting ‘Iceberg’. Stop doing the iceberg’s job for it.” But there are worse names than Remoaners, such as…
Enemies of the people
This is how the Daily Mail dubbed judges who ruled that Parliament should decide on when Article 50 (notice of EU withdrawal) should be triggered. This diatribe, an echo of Nazi rhetoric, occurred even though the Leave campaign was supposedly about returning power to Parliament. The fear, apparently, was that MPs might not decide on the kind of Brexit the Daily Mail wants (see Psychic Ballot Paper). Those who don’t follow the exact wishes of the Mail have also been called…
You would have thought that the sabotage is being conducted by a government which admits not doing an economic assessment before deciding to leave the single market and customs union, and has not done the preparation work for such a departure. That is why the government has asked for a…
Even though the government delayed triggering Article 50, it won’t be ready by March 2019. So it wants to stay in the EU institutions for another two years or so. Or, to be more precise, it wants a “have your cake and eat it” deal in that period. The May government prefers the term “implementation period” to “transition period”. But if the
The worry is that if the
All will be well when the
This is an odd example to pick as
Stab in the back
Another revived inter-war German slogan. Blame is already being lined up on those who opposed Brexit (see Remoaners, Enemies of the people) for not being positive enough. It was the little boy’s fault that the Emperor had no clothes.
NextFinancial markets abhor an equilibrium